Joe Schaefer wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:52:39 -0800: > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 12:40 PM > > Subject: Re: suggested CMS workflows for ooo-site > > > > > > On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > >> Also Dave get in the habit of checking buildbot for the > >> build status of sledgehammer commits instead of waiting > >> for svnmailer to figure out what to do with the massive > >> diff it's trying to make sense of. The url is > >> > >> > >> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ooo-site-site-staging > > > > I do do that, but tend to wait for the email anyway. If there is no reason > > to > > wait that will save time. > > Buildbot performs the commit back as the final step in the build, > so if buildbot thinks the build has completed successfully, you > do not need to wait for svnmailer to send out a notice to that effect. > > My experience is that the turnaround between sledgehammer commits > and eventual publication is about 1 hour: ~20 min for each step > along the way, all because of svn committing or merging
Instead of: % cd production-wc % svn merge $URL/to/staging can you: % svnmucc -mm rm $URL/to/production cp $somerev $URL/to/staging $URL/to/production > huge volumes > of data.
