If it hasn't currently a volunteer in Solaris Intel, maybe Andrew Rist and Mouette Yang (me) can do. But Solaris Sparc..... Mmm.... if anyone can provide Sparc Machine, we can help this platform.
2012/1/5 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com>: > On 1/4/12 7:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> Last week I posted a note pointing to a draft 3.4 release plan on the >> wiki: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Release+Plan >> >> A few of you have step up to volunteer for some tasks. This is great. >> This is just a draft, so feel free to modify, add additional >> high-level tasks, etc. >> >> Some of the items on the wiki are not tasks for individual volunteers, >> but things we need to agree on before we can release. For some of >> these items, we should try to come to a consensus now, so we can >> ensure that the plan accounts for everything we want to do. >> >> So one item from the wiki: What platforms do we want to release 3.4 >> binary packages for? >> >> With 3.3.0 we had: >> >> Windows Intel MSI >> Linux Intel RPM >> Linux Intel DEB >> Linux x86-64 RPM >> Linux x86-64 DEB >> Mac OS Intel DMG >> Mac OS PPC DMG >> Solaris Intel PKG >> Solaris Sparc PKG >> >> Do we want to do the same with 3.4? Add ports? Remove ports? We >> obviously have active porting work around BSD and OS/2. Is the intent >> to have them be Apache releases? Or to be released separately? > > > ok it looks that we can provide > > Windows > Linux 32/64 bit + RPM/DEB > MacOS Intel DMG > > Solaris Intel is probably also possible, correct? > > Solaris Sparc? Do we have a machine and a volunteer who would do the build? > > Free BSD, OS/2 later > > From my pov i would say Windows, Linux, Mac are mandatory, Solaris would be > good but no release stopper for me. If Solaris would come a little bit later > would be also fine. > > Juergen > > > >> >> Personally, I'd temper "what we want" with "what can we accomplish >> well". In other words, what platforms do we think we can cover, from >> a dev and test perspective, so we can have a solid 3.4 release, one >> were we can confidently ask the IPMC to approve a release, and be >> proud to read the reviews? There might be one answer for AOO 3.4 and >> an expanded answer for AOO 4.0, >> >> -Rob > >
