On 07/01/12 18:44, drew wrote: > On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 12:09 -0500, Carl Marcum wrote: >> On 01/07/2012 07:33 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> Is sameone around here with Java 7? I hear that LO 3.4.x has trubble >>> with Java 7. So this is probabily also a problem at AOO 3.4. Can sameone >>> test this? >> >> I installed OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US from >> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
>> When I try to add a 1.7 jre, I receive a "The folder you selected does >> not contain a Java runtime environment" error. >> >> I can also confirm this is the same behavior as OOo 3.3.0 I have >> installed by download previously. > > IIRC, the fix turned out to be an update to a string resource in the > code - easy hack - but that comes from reading along on a mailing list, > third hand information ;-/ i think the problem was that the java.vendor property has changed, because sadly "Sun Microsystems Inc." does not exist anymore. now i have no idea why the heck OOo needs to know which JVM it's running with, but then again the C++ UNO stuff creates vtables out of whole cloth at runtime, so presumably the public JVM interfaces aren't good enough either :)
