Am 15.01.2012 01:46, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Hi there,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:36:34AM +0100, O.Felka wrote:
I'm using this Office
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe
on WinXP - SP3.
Regards,Ok, without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense. It makes no
sense to jumpp from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see if
something is fixed.
Olaf
I'm using
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Regards,
Zoltan
Ok, I see.
Without an official AOO build QA work is nonsense.
I tend to disagree here. It seems you're not subscribed to the issues
mailing list ([email protected]). Many issues
have been discovered (and even solved) since we started providing builds
for testing purposes.
I'm writing about AOO and Java 7 (see subject).
Calling this a nonsense is underestimating the efforts of people doing the
build, people doing the QA (Regina, Reizinger, Oliver, et. al.), and
people solving the issues.
Just to quote an example, Regina's work testing the new SVG
implementation is remarkable, and I'm sure Armin appreciates it.
This example doesn't fit. I've you've watched the issue
(https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118352) and this thread
you'll see that I've been told to try
- http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/
-
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1229535/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
- http://people.apache.org/~orw/
That's not the same as the work of Regina and Armin.
Facts have shown that builds are useful, we have volunteers willing to
help QAing, so we should keep providing them until we have official weekly
Developer Snapshots.
That said, I agree that the situation is suboptimal, but we do not have
buildboots for all platforms yet.
It makes no sense
to jump from developer playground A to developer build b to c to see
if something is fixed or not.
Back to the present issue, as I wrote in the bug, we have to split:
a) this issue, detect JRE 7.0 version
b) issues with things that don't work with JRE 7
For (b), please open new bug reports of the kind "[java 7] XXX does not work"
or the like. And set them as blockers for i118352 when/if they are
confirmed.
And I wrote that this are two sides of one medal. Fixing a) without b)
is senseless. So it has to be fixed in one go.
Regards
Olaf
Regards
