Hi On 8 February 2012 11:49, Andre Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08.02.2012 17:31, Stuart Swales wrote: >> >> On 07/02/2012 14:02, Andre Fischer wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I recently had a little time to look at the pootle data. Here is what I >>> have found out so far. Please keep in mind that this is new for me and >>> that my interpretations may be wrong. >>> >>> For context I will start with a short description of the directory >>> structure of the 80 GB of the backup disk: >>> >>> In the top-level podirectory/ there is a sub-directory openoffice_org/ >>> that probably is the translation data of OpenOffice.org. It contains >>> sub-directories for most languages (more on the exact set below.) >>> The content of podirectory is available at [1]. >>> >>> Below the top-level backup/ there are two directories DEV_m103/ and >>> DEV_94/ for two milestones. Below these you can find directories like >>> backconvert-110326/ that probably contain backups for certain dates >>> (March 26 2011 in this example. The most recent is >>> DEV_m103/backconvert-110401 from April 1st of last year. >>> >>> After comparing time stamps I now think that we can disregard the whole >>> backup/ directory. There are .po files under podirectory/ that are from >>> later then April 1st. Some files are from May. >>> >>> I then tried to find out whether the pootle data are older or newer than >>> the data in the extras/l10n module in our SVN repository. The timestamps >>> in the .sdf files are useless, our tools set them all to 2002-02-02. The >>> file time stamps can not be used directly because of the differing >>> directory structures. >>> >>> Comparing the set of lanuages of the pootle server and that in >>> extras/l10n/ was also inconclusive: >>> The set of languages that are present in both data sets is >>> af ar as ast bg bn bo bs ca cs cy da dz es et fa fr fur ga gd gl gu he >>> hi hu id is it ja jbo ka kab kn ko ku lt lv ml mr my nb nl nn nr nso ny >>> oc om or pap pl ps pt ru sc si sk so sq ss st sv ta te th tn tr ts ug >>> uk uz ve vi xh zu >>> >>> Languages only in extras/l10n/ are: >>> be-BY br brx de dgo el eo eu fi hr kid kk km kok ks ky mai mk mn mni ne >>> pa-IN ro rw sa-IN sat sd sh sl sr sw-TZ tg >>> >>> Languages only on the pootle server are: >>> pyg son tk tlh >>> >>> See [2] for a list of language ids. (tlh for example is klingon) >>> >>> >>> So, we probably have to merge both data sets and hope for the best. >>> Any information from people who know the localization process better is >>> welcome. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Andre >>> >>> >>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~af/index.html >>> [2] http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php >> >> >> >> And what has happened to en-GB and en-ZA ? > > > Ah, at least one person who reads my mails :-) > > I forgot to add the following languages as being present in both locations: > ca-XV en-GB en-ZA pt-BR zh-CN zh-TW > > Reason: These six language ids are written slightly differently on the > pootle server (with a '_' (underline) in the middle) and in l10n/ (with a > '-' (dash)). I sorted them differently and then forgot about them. Sorry.
Thanks. And I too actually read your mail messages :-)--and deep appreciate the work. ciao louis > > -Andre
