Dave, Yes. that is great documentation.
I reached the Too-Much-Information point on getting to execution of Python code from my people.apache.org account. But it is confirmed that I can use the publish link on the CMS browser view of the site, and that will be sufficient in the near-term. Downloading and installing the CMS and all of the Python modules is just amazing. It is great that Kay has documented it so nicely. I have bookmarked that page of the Wiki. Of course my desktop machine's web server is IIS 7, and I have managed not to use it so far. It is wonderful that you and Kay have the level of devotion required to master all of this. At the moment, that's a bridge too far among the abundance of areas where I already lack fluency. I think my ambition to be a developer on this project is misguided. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:04 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH] fieldmaster Hi Dennis, Kay recently updated this page: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/website-local.html Does this provide any illumination for you? AFAIK - api is a special case and was discussed in the past. I'll find the thread if needed. Regards, Dave On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I am not clear what is what would be called the maintainable source in the > case of the ooo-site. > > It is useful to know that some of the pages are generated automatically as > byproducts of other processes (such as an IDL processor/generator) and are > not the maintainable source. > > I wonder if there are places in the ooo-site publication staging- and > tool-chain where one also must be careful not to patch downstream from the > preferred source. > > Knowing there are other steps needed beyond committing working-copy changes > to the ooo-site SVN is more mystery meat. The only way I have seen for > triggering publishing of the site is on the CMS browser interface. I have no > idea if that is the place for performing the missing step. > > - Dennis > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 23:59 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fieldmaster > > Hi Joe, > > > On 2/9/12 3:22 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> Well no, but the beauty of svn is that you only need >> to deal with the section of the tree you are interested >> in. So don't check-out all of ooo-site just to apply this >> tiny patch- look at the patch to see which directory >> it applies to and just check-out THAT. >> >> >> Applying the patch is a matter of cd'ing to that >> directory and running >> >> % patch< path/to/email/msg.txt >> % svn commit -m 'apply fieldmaster patch' >> > > I hope you can give me a hint what I am missing... > > > I checked out > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/api > some time ago and made some changes for example in the index.html (e.g. > removed the project lead names) > > I checked the content locally and check in the index.html. But when I > browse the API site my changes are not yet visible there. > > Which step is missing? > > Juergen > > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Rob Weir<[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 9:17 PM >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fieldmaster >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Joe Schaefer<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> No idea if this is sufficient Ric, but I used the CMS >>>> to email this patch as I explained earlier. >>>> >>> >>> Cool. But unless we have more committers download ooo-site and set up >>> an off-line site build environment, these patches are going to be slow >>> to integrate. I'm guilty as well. I'll find some time to get this >>> set up on my machine. >>> >>> Or is there any easier way to suck these patches into the CMS? For >>> example, it would be really cool if there was an "upload/apply patch" >>> button in the CMS "edit" view. That would enable any committer to >>> review and apply site patches, even the ones not comfortable with SVN >>> and command-line tools. >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: Joe Schaefer<[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Cc: >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 1969 7:00 PM >>>>> Subject: [PATCH] fieldmaster >>>>> >>>>> Here's the patch for Ric's issue. >>>> ... >>>> >>> >
