On 2/24/12 8:33 AM, O.Felka wrote: > Am 24.02.2012 06:20, schrieb Zhe Liu: >> 在 2012年2月24日 上午10:37，Ma Yong Lin<[email protected]> 写道： >>> I think what was asked is if we are just get a group of star basic test >>> cases "translated" >>> to java. It would be the same in terms of testing. >>> >> We can do that, but I think it's more meaningful to cover the GUI >> testing for new functions in future, since the existing function has >> been very stable. > > I think that it is worth the effort and very helpfull to translate the > old Star Basic tests to Java. We have had always regressions in the > existing and 'stable' functions. So we really need the old tests for > finding regressions in the existing functionality.
every test if old or new working with this new automation tool is welcome and highly appreciated. Maybe it's easier for new develoeprs to work with existing tests and make them available for the new environment. Volunteers are always welcome. But in generaI would agree that we should focus on new tests for new changes. And most people would like to work on something new ;-) Juergen > > Olaf > > >> >>> So besides java developer may benefit from this, anything else? >> >> The library will wrap all complex things and aims to make learning >> curve enough short for both programmer and non-programmer. In >> addition, localization developers may benefit from it to locate some >> UI. I'm not sure and need to investigate further. >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Ma Yong Lin >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> 在 2012-2-23，9:38，Zhe Liu<[email protected]> 写道： >>> >>>> 2012/2/23 FR web forum<[email protected]>: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> <cut> >>>>>>> As mentioned before, I plan to replace VCL TestTool with a Java >>>>>>> library for GUI testing. >>>>> <cut> >>>>> Do you think that a translation in other languages could improve >>>>> its usefulness? >>>> Sorry. I didn't catch you. You mean translate that wiki or the tool >>>> in other languages? >>>> Thank for your suggestion. >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards >>>> From [email protected] >> >> The previous discussion is here. >> http://markmail.org/thread/nz4mgwk3k3b3rb2w#query:+page:1+mid:aalron753ul3rb5f+state:res >> >> >
