Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I would urge you to make sure you allow significant time for IP review from mentors and the IPMC. I imagine this release will get a great deal of attention and, almost without a doubt, someone will come up with something that needs to be addressed.
Ross 2012/2/24 Jürgen Schmidt <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > we move closer forward to our first release. > > I would like to suggest that we focus on the following areas next week. And > I would like to propose the following schedule depending on the progress we > will make next week. > > > Monday: Feb. 27th new dev snapshots > Monday: March 5th first RC candidate (based on the progress next week) > > - increase QA work > - focus on stabilization, means focus on showstopper issues > - finalize the About dialog information, input for future bug reports > - online update service > > - updating building guides in the wiki > > > - documentation update can be run in parallel and are independent of the > binary release > - translation update, we have made minimal UI changes only and we will use > the 3.4 beta translation that were in place. > > Anything else that comes into your minds? > > I have started to work on the MacOS building guide and have simplified some > things (work ongoing). > > We need some volunteers who take a look on the other platforms. Especially > reference to the hg repo should be removed/replaced to our svn repo. > Information about childworkspaces can be removed because it is not longer > relevant for us. I would say the focus should be on simplification. > > What do others think about it? > > Juergen -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
