From: Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Build broken on FreeBSD. Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:16:41 -0500
> I think I prefer the first option: the sysv/linux versioning doesn't > really fit for FreeBSD and I expect we will be using the > prepackaged version of apr and serf as soon as that option is > available. > > Patching ltmain.sh is something we can probably manage for > coinmp but if we have to do the same for apr, serf, and whatever > new library IBM or someone else brings in the future I don't think > that will scale well. No, both doesn't scale, and I prefer patching ltmain.sh. In the former solution, we have to patch files in scp2 almost everywhere and introduce additioan IF DEF for each shared lib. We also patch prj/d.lst as well. This is much more tedious than expected. I understand Linux style versioning won't fit for FreeBSD, but if you don't like it, just use external libs. Thanks -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/ http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
