Am 03/02/2012 05:08 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Issue 118037 - https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118037 - should
be closed as WONTFIX or INVALID from my point of view. Thus, for me it is
also no AOO 3.4 release blocker.
Instead of closing,would it make sense to just turn this into an
enhancement request and remove the release blocker flag? That way it
will still show up in BZ as a feature that someone might volunteer to
implement in a future release.
What is the convention for dealing with things like this? I agree it
is "WONTFIX" for 3.4. But can't we just leave it open for possible
fix in future releases?
I don't like to do a kind of transform of issues that wanted to have a
and now b. Of course in this kind both things are connected to each
other. And it may OK when you just have to modify a bit the, e.g,
summary line.
But when you have to change the fields and mainly the summary line
completely, then you also turn the history of the issue completely.
Therefore I would prefer to create a new issue.
But maybe it doesn't matter what I'm writing as you have already changed
the issue and produced the facts. ;-)
My 2 ct
Marcus
