On 2012/03/03 07:40, Gavin McDonald said: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: imacat [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Saturday, 3 March 2012 4:11 AM >> To: Apache OpenOffice Developers >> Subject: Pootle Anonymous Privilege >> I revised the zh-TW translation on http://translate.apache.org/, >> updated/added 709 messages, and found that I have not logged in. ^^; Well, >> that's OK for me. But it's a little scary that anyone can submit the > translation >> without logging in. Shouldn't we limit the privilege of the anonymous > users? > > It is the expected and wanted behaviour , anyone without an account and not > logged > in are quite welcome to submit suggestions and translations. > It is the logged in Apache Committers that can then review and apply those.
Thank you for the answer. I think I failed to clear my question.
^^; I mean, I "applied" all the translation without logging in.
As for my experience with Pootle, I believe there are at least two
types of privileges: Reviewers can see the "submit" and the "suggest"
buttons, and the translators can see only the "suggest" button.
Apparently now anonymous user can see both buttons, and can apply the
translations directly.
So, if that is the wanted behavior, do you mean we should review and
apply "offline"?
--
Best regards,
imacat ^_*' <[email protected]>
PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
<<Woman's Voice>> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
