On 16 March 2012 12:06, Donald Harbison <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Ross Gardler > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> This discussion seems to have stalled, that's a shame it was a good >> idea and I saw a few people willing to take on the work. >> >> FWIW, I did meetup with Dave Fisher in San Francisco recently. We had a > great cup of SF coffee, and spent some time together discussing his > participation and contributions in the project. I've now got to shape my > notes up into a draft and get it back to Dave for some further polishing, > then I'll be able to get it posted on list here for folks to review.
Brilliant, I hope others are able to do similar in whatever way feels comfortable to them (email, skype, coffee) >> My suggestion is for those wanting to try this out to just do it. It >> doesn't need to be perfect or meet the full and active approval of the >> PPMC. Just as long as it is something and nobody objects. >> >> OK, thanks this helps. I was perhaps being too concerned with process, and > that slowed me down a bit. Yes, reaching consensus on a process is hard. Lets just see what emerges. If two people start doing useful stuff in different ways then we just figure out how to make them co-exist, that might mean merging processes or it might mean having two sources of interview content. Lets see how it goes. Ross
