Am 20.03.12 00:50, schrieb Rob Weir: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> based on the analysis [1] of Andre and the feedback I got from Raphael, >> Pavel, Claudio I would like to propose the following approach to bring our >> AOO project on the Apache Pootle server into a well defined state. >> >> Status: Raphael had set up the current project based on the backup data. >> >> We have 2 projects, one for UI and one for Help. I think that is a good >> schema that we should use in the future as well. For the future I would >> propose a schema where we have a 2 projects. One for the last stable version >> to allow translators to finish their translation work for a stable release. >> And a second working project that we use for continuous integration and >> ongoing translation work. >> >> Something like >> aoo34 - Apache OpenOffice 3.4 UI >> aoo34help - Apache OpenOffice 3.4 Help >> >> aoo40 - Apache OpenOffice 4.0 UI >> aoo40 - Apache OpenOffice 4.0 Help >> >> > I like this idea. We might even extend it in the future if we have > the concept of a Long Term Support (LTS) release that we want to > maintain for a longer period of time. Then we could have three > projects in Pootle: > > 1) Current, ongoing work > > 2) Most recent release > > 3) Most recent LTS release > > But we can start with just 1 & 2 for now. And I hope, we can do all the translation befor the major release. Only one note, The OOo Translations takes a load of space, so it makes not realy sense to have too much projects. Minor changes we can also do with a offline editor. You can search the string in POOTLE and then open the right file in a offline Editor. I think a LTS needs not to be hosted on Pootle.
We will create one for 340 and one for 400. Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
