Thanks Juergen for the update! I will try to keep this page alive and make it a place for people to know the latest status and find the opportunity to contribute. :)
- Simon 2012/3/22 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com> > On 3/21/12 8:38 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote: > >> Hi, all, >> I tried to update the Project Reporting wiki and added AOO 3.4 status. >> https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** >> Project+Reporting<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Reporting> >> >> My intention is to make a centralized place for people to get a big >> picture on what's going on, and what's the open issues... For now the only >> way for me to get those information is to go through all the mails... I >> hope this wiki page can help a little bit... I will try to make regular >> update according to what I got from the mail list. While I think every one >> is free to add items there. >> >> Please tell me if any comment/suggestion. >> Thanks! >> >> > Hi Simon, > > I like the idea and it is good if somebody will collect all the > information and aggregate it in one place. > > Right now I see only 2 names there but I would like to mention that it is > a community effort and project. That means anybody can help to work on the > open todos as it already happened. Thanks to all and feel free to add your > name in the wiki when you work on something special that helps to bring > AOO3.4 on the road. > > Many more people are working on the remaining tasks ... > > The pootle server is up and running and we have a first set of languages > present. I think work is already ongoing. But we have a problem with > contributions right now because only committers can really work with the > pootle server. And based on some feedback many translators prefer to use > offline tools and we will provide mpo files for them as well on demand. In > the future we will checkin in the po files for easier access and to become > independent from a pootle server. > > I have updated the wiki a little bit. > > Thanks > > Juergen > > > PS: We tried it with the Release Plan wiki page but it was not really > accepted or better not really updated. I have to confess that I stopped > working on it when I have noticed that nobody else used it. >
