As the suggestion is basically another way of saying what I originally wrote, I am fine with it. To the extent that my opinion reflects the wishes of the infra team, I don't think anyone on the team will object.
>________________________________ > From: Ross Gardler <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:59 AM >Subject: Re: Feedback Requested: Proposed SourceForce Mirror of AOO 3.4 > >On 26 March 2012 17:22, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Mark Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> - SourceForge.net would be the “recommended default download” on the >>> website. >>> > >>> > What would that look like? On what page do we make this branch? In >>> > most of our communications we will point the public to this URL: >>> > >>> > http://download.openoffice.org >>> > >>> > (That then redirects to http://www.openoffice.org/download/) >>> > >>> > The download link then provided to the user is matched to their >>> > platform and language, based on their request headers. >>> >>> My thoughts would be that we split based on user preference at this >>> page, by showing two links. One for the sf.net download, and another >>> for the apache mirror network based download. >>> >>> >> This sounds good to me. >> >> Any feedback from Apache Infra on this proposal? Or anyone else from the >> PPMC? (Silence is consent) > >I think we need an explicit OK from Joe on this one with his infra hat >on. I'll touch base with him to make sure he has read this thread. > >Ross > > >
