On 03/30/2012 04:15 PM, drew wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:52 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Kay Schenk<[email protected]> wrote:
On 03/30/2012 06:20 AM, drew jensen wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 08:03 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Kay Schenk<[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rob Weir<[email protected]> wrote:
What is the latest thinking on the AOO logos?
There is some great material on the wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**
Application+Branding<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Application+Branding>
https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**
AOOLogo+proposal<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOOLogo+proposal>
https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**
Logo+Proposals<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals>
Drew did a lot of initial work here. But it is not clear to me
whether we have a final recommendation, whether the work is ongoing,
etc.
If we have a design that is considered the one to go with, could
someone propose it as the official logo, so we can see if there are
any objections? It would be good to get some closure on this.
yes, I know...I am rather late to this party.
I would be happy to make a proposal to adopt the first banner on
https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**Logo+Proposals<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals>
as the "official" web logo, and actually make this change, but...
where are we with the "incubating" business. Would we have this in
addition
to the current "incubating" logo which we currently have or ???
I probably have missed other discussions about the "incubating" topic.
The incubation requirement is that we have "(incubating)" on the *page*
along with the podling disclaimer. We're not required to have
"(incubating)" in the logo. In fact, some of us have recommended that we
do not put "(incubating)" in the logo. If we can have a "clean" logo
without that, then we can use the same logo after we graduate.
well, all the artwork I've submitted and I've said this before, is setup
up with layers - just open it, hide or remove the layer named
'incubating' and it's gone.
Also, I'll feel a little artistic this week, after doing that timeline
;-). So next I'd like to then take the logo design, and create two
variations that we can use to inform users about the 3.4 release.
-- a "coming soon" webpage/blog logo that project supporters may put
on their websites. It would be linked to a page that we would host,
with FAQ's on AOO 3.4, including information on signing up for the
ooo-announce list, etc.
- a "get AOO" logo, also for supports to use on their own websites.
It would be linked to our download webpage on openoffice.org.
The nice thing about this approach (which is used by many other
projects) is we do not need to give blanket permission for anyone to
use our main logo for any purpose. And we don't need to have them ask
permission for using our logo for these specific purposes. We provide
a special purpose logo to be used for these common things.
Well I would be happy to do an actual PROPOSAL with Lazy Consensus from
among the following 3 logos on:
https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**Logo+Proposals<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals>
* the first logo under the heading
1.1 Proposed banner logo for the main web site
* or either of the orb-centric proposals
2.1 Orb Centric Proposal Logo #1,
2.2 Orb Centric Proposal Logo #2
Rob, given your explanation, I'm assuming we would keep the "(incubating)"
wording next to the logo as we have now.
Re your other comments...the "Coming soon" logo does sound like a
nice/worthwhile idea. Something we can work on soonish...
Hi all --
I just noticed on:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics
that use of the "Apache feather" requires the "TM" symbol so...maybe Drew
or someone graphically inclined could do this to that first logo on
Hi Kay,
I'd think the intent of the line:
"For the project's official logo (if it has one, and especially if it
uses the ASF feather), ensure that it includes a small "TM" symbol in
the graphic or immediately adjacent to it."
is not requiring the tm be adjacent to the feather glyph but the
official project designator, which I think, looking at the page again
just now, all of the images do. They certainly all include use of the tm
marking within the full image.
But I'll do what it takes to follow the groups thought on this.
//drew
ah! OK, I think you may be right! All right then, no problem! and thanks
for responding so quickly.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals
We can take a vote without it but it would need to be changed before use.
Also, I was trying to find if there were any restrictions on graphic type
-- png vs jpg etc. I can't find anything but just thought I'd ask. The orb
centric logos are jpg but could presumable be converted if needed.
-Rob
--
------------------------------**------------------------------**
----------------------------
MzK
"Women and cats will do as they please,
and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea."
--
Robert Heinlein
--
------------------------------**------------------------------**
------------
MzK
"Women and cats will do as they please,
and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea."
-- Robert Heinlein
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"Women and cats will do as they please,
and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea."
-- Robert Heinlein
