On 4/3/12 8:26 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Mar 3/4/12, eric b<[email protected]> ha scritto:
Your patches are very straightforward but .. heck, we
are so near the release I personally won't run risks.
Ok no problem. Thanks for the attachment on the issue.
anyway.
Well, if it builds we should consider it. Your original
patch had a small problem: You removed the if HAS_HUNSPELL
flag that some of us use for the preinstalled hunspell.
On FreeBSD we are using 1.3.2 (shared with LO).
Something cosmetical is that I like to keep the patches
without version number (hunspell.patch instead of
hunspell-1.3.1.patch) because it's useful to review in SVN
how the patch has changed.
My intention was simply to provide a fast answer. I'll try
to do some cleanup today, build and test it, and to provide
a better patch. Just in case, I added more information to
Simon (on this list), and if someone else will try, she or
he's welcome
And big thanks ... it was indeed a fast answer!
mmh, it comes very later and if we update we should update to the latest
version. I would recommend to do it after the 3.4
Juergen
Pedro.
