Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I'm also not clear that logos and related artifacts qualify as open-source
concerning the trademark issues.
I don't know how to crack that strange entanglement.
Look at what Mozilla does, for example. The default build options do not
include the project logos.
This seems reasonable. A build should only include official branding if
a non-default build option is specified. This mitigates the risk of
people making minor code modifications and inadvertently breaking the
trademark/logo policies.
Regards,
Andrea.
