Hi Herbert; --- Gio 5/4/12, Herbert Duerr <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> > This looks like the compiler provided STL not STLport. > We are using STLport: the build just doesn't work disabling STLport. > Mixing these two template libraries is not a good idea, e.g. > when using the system silgraphite with system STL and the > internal AOO libs with the in-tree STLport. I guess it will > work better if you don't run configure > -with-system-graphite, but only with --enable-graphite. Then > AOO will build graphite with the same STL template library > it is using itself. > We did that a while ago but it still causes breakage. > > Maho-san has a workaround in the BSD port that is not > acceptable for > > the codebase [...] > > Do you happen to have a link to the diff? > You are warned that it's really ugly. The bug is in VCL or in STLport but we workaround it in Graphite: http://s.apache.org/HPl > > [...] > > Unfortunately, despite the BZ cleanup, it is still not > clear to me on which > > category this should be filed in! It is not > installation error, nor ucb > > or sdk > > or wp (that category probably doesn't belong in our bz > anymore), how > > should it be classified, a new category perhaps? > > I'd put it into GSL, because GSL ("graphics system layer") > libraries are involved. > Thanks! It is not clear to the new guys (like me) so some polishing from our bugzilla experts is welcome. I will open a new issue and I will upload the build log. cheers, Pedro.
