On Apr 20, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Pedro Giffuni wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:41:19 -0700: >> Hello; >> >> --- Ven 20/4/12, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> ha scritto: >> ... >>> OOo PPMC: >>> >>> Several mirror operators have asked whether they are >>> expected to carry >>> both their preexisting/legacy OOo mirrors and the AOOo >>> mirror. >>> >>> We're assuming the legacy OOo mirrors can be dropped once an >>> AOOo >>> release is Out There. If that's not the case, say so. >>> >>> Reminder: ASF's policy is that Apache mirrors may only carry >>> the latest >>> release from each minor line (1.5.x, 1.6.x, ...) which is >>> still >>> supported / developed by the community. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -- >>> Apache Infrastructure >>> >> >> We are specifically warning people that the older OOo releases >> contain security and IP risks so it would be inconsistent to >> carry those in Apache mirrors. >> >> So, yes, those can be dropped. >> > > Thanks, I'll take that answer back to the mirror operators if no one > disagrees in the next few days.
I think that Kay just disagreed, but only on the ooo-dev part of the thread. Regards, Dave > >> best regards, >> >> Pedro. >> >> ps. This doesn't relate to Regina's request to keep an archive of >> some older content. >> > > I haven't seen that request.
