On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:01 PM, NoOp <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/30/2012 06:12 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:41 PM, NoOp <...> wrote: > ... >>> o "However, what no one has permission to do is modify OpenOffice and >>> then confuse consumers into believing that it is actually still the >>> OpenOffice product. ". That is likely to put Apache on the defensive to >>> prove that the 'consumer' didn't receive a proper copy of AO/OOo. IANAL >>> so check with your legal folks regarding such statements. >>> >> >> Absurd. > > And why would you feel that this is absurd? The entire blog is in > reference to "Avoiding OpenOffice Download Scams". In the second > paragraph you state: >
Thanks for taking the time to send feedback on the draft blog post. This is greatly appreciated. Regards, -Rob
