Suggest we add AOO 340 version as official release. And for those existing opening defects, basically they should be moved to this version as well. But considering we are not sure if many old defects still valid for AOO 3.4, it's better add one version as OOO and change all the defects before AOO 3.4 to this version. To be honest, I am not sure how we handle these large volume of old defects. From QA view, I'd like monitor those high severity defects and verify them against AOO 340+ to check if they exist as well.
Once AOO 340 is announced, all users can submit their feedback against AOO 340. Also branch version should be provide to track against which version volunteer should report issue. For component, I totally agree Regina's suggestion. Also one target version filed is need to track the fixed stream for given bug. Best regards, Lily 2012/5/1 Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> > Today, among the 100 version strings the users need to scroll through > in BZ, we have "AOO340-dev". > > What do we want after we release AOO 3.4? > > Add AOO340? (Or just rename AOO340-dev to AOO340?) > > Add AOO341-dev? > > Add AOO450-dev? > > Also, are there any "products" that can be removed or demoted to > "components" under another product? What we have now is simpler than > what we had with OOo, but it is still very complicated with a lot of > "dead wood" at the top level. > > -Rob >
