Am 05/07/2012 11:05 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On May 7, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 05/07/2012 08:27 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Juergen Schmidt<[email protected]
wrote:
On Monday, 7. May 2012 at 18:33, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
<[email protected]>wrote:
On 5/7/12 5:32 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Andrea Pescetti<[email protected]>
wrote:
On 06/05/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
It's much improved now, but it seems we still miss several files
unless
the upload is still ongoing. ...
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
deb_LG.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
rpm_LG.tar.gz
for virtually all values of LG (ar, cs, de and so on).
All files listed in
http://www.openoffice.org/****download/test/checksums_new_****dl.html<
http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/checksums_new_**dl.html>
<http://www.openoffice.
**org/download/test/checksums_**new_dl.html<
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html>
are now available. So now there shouldn't be any missing files any
longer.
OK, thanks for this...the "official" checksums file should now be
living
in
http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/checksums/**
3.4.0_checksums.html<
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/checksums/3.4.0_checksums.html
.
I need tomake sure this is the most recent version before moving on.
And, I do think this needed its own page...
you mean the checksums have to be on a separate page? Why? Why make it
so
complicate? I don't understand the reason.
Pleas explain it to me, I am eager to learn ;-)
I can't really give you an explanation except to say this is how it was
done in the past. The current checksums page is quite large...they COULD
be
tacked on to other.html I guess, but it just seems cleaner this
well a lot of room for improvements. The pages with the centered tables
with different widths looks of course not really professional or what do
others think?
It's not that bad I guess. But sure it would go better.
I've also realized that there are no bullet points display when doing a list with<ul>
or<ol>.
Probably needs some css magic.
Yes, I would guess either in the "styles.css" or in the
"exceptions.css". Let's see...
I really hope we can revamp the whole page in the future. A cleaner,
simpler design. Consistent translated content with a modern fresh design ;-)
Sure. However, this needs time. An expert can do it maybe in less time. But I'm
just a little volunteer in his spare time that has less knowledge with
HTML/CSS/JS than you with the AOO source code and full time. ;-)
I understand. But, I think Marcus did a GREAT job with this in the time we
had to get this going. A LOT of work really...
We do have a lot of changes and considerations for the future -- no
disagreement from me there. Mock-ups would be appreciated. :)
Or some links to other websites as reference.
These can be on the wiki that Kay will make. There is a whole range. I suspect
that there is some hovering magic we can do, but perhaps simple is best. Our
users don't always have a lot of bandwidth.
You mean this one, right?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Improvements+for+the+download+webpages
More in coming weeks. Great work Marcus, Kay and Jürgen and others!
Thanks. :-)
Marcus
