On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:43 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi Drew; > > On 05/10/12 16:35, drew jensen wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:24 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> Hi guys; > >> > >> For 4.0 we have a task without owner to bring in the hsqldb CWS. > >> > >> I would like to help in that but I am not good at using Hg and there > >> appears to be some sort of a mess ... Looking at the web interface: > >> > >> http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/hsqldb19/ > >> > >> It would appear like there is only one changeset?? > > 1.9 is rather out of date, hsql is at 2.2.x currently. > > It works with 2.2.x, the CWS was started when 1.9 was current. > > > Are you sure this is where you want to put your efforts - It would be > > really a good thing, IMO, to maybe take a look at removing Base as a > > standard package, moving it to an extension, and leaving behind a > > runtime package for ODB files. > > The idea is good, however I think it should be updated first since > the hard part of that is already done.
Ok - well, it shouldn't hurt right - then again I really feel that the developers on base ended up paying a heavy price with their time from the decision to field the embedded hsql sdbc - overall it is much better now then it was, that's true enough - anyway, it you think it's a reasonably fast change to finish, it would be nice to have use of the stored procedures... //drew
