On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 23:13 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote: > Hi Louis, > > We can start sharing codes.
That is not really what it says, nor what it means IMO. With regard to the MPL specifically, I asked during a session on licensing at the recent Apache Barcamp the question of mixing MPL within an Apache project, it was clear from the response that this is not a reasonable expectation. //drew > I like it. > :) > Thanks, > khirano > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <[email protected]> wrote: > > See below > > > > (Nonsense words? iPad's spellchecker.) > > > > -- Louis Suárez-Potts > > > > > > > > On 2012-05-23, at 9:55, Kazunari Hirano <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Shane, > >> > >> Thanks for the links. > >> It's good. I like it. > > > > What do you like? > > > >> :) > >> Thanks, > >> khirano > >> > >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Shane Curcuru <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> In case folks haven't seen this: > >>> > >>> http://legal-discuss.markmail.org/thread/mleqsm636zf5fqia > >>> > >>> Which points to: > >>> > >>> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Relicensing > >>> > >>> So it looks like there will be plenty of code sharing! 8-> > >>> > >>> - Shane > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> [email protected] > >> Apache OpenOffice (incubating) > >> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/ > > >
