On 5/29/12 5:00 PM, drew jensen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 05:59 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Andrea Pescetti<[email protected]>wrote:
Anything else might conflict with Canonical's commercial interests and is
thus a totally different issue.
Oh really? ;-) see Shuttleworth's words on the LibreOffice fork and the
"radical faction" (sic)
http://ho.io/libreoffice
Personally, I think he might be more inclined to add Apache OO to Ubuntu
than you think.
Well, if you like the poll idea then I suppose you also like the outcome
- people do not want LibO replaced w/ AOO.
So, I hope from you (and others), this will the end of it.
I think we would be all happy if users would have at least the choice
;-) And the choice in a way that it is expected and common on the system
and comfortable for the users.
I would very much appreciate if users can choose and I suggest that we
focus on our project to influence the decision of users in a positive
way for AOO ;-)
Juergen
