--- Mar 5/6/12, Andre Fischer <[email protected]> ha scritto: .. > Hi Pedro, > > On 04.06.2012 22:05, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Thank you Andre! > > > > I normally dislike perl but external_libs.lst surely > > looks nice now. > > Thanks. Well, I dislike Python and did not want to introduce > yet another scripting language. >
That's fine. > > > > One wish for the future .. hmm.. if I use the external > > package (for example for python) it would be nice to > > disable downloading the corresponding tarballs too. > > That is possibly now by just changing the data file. I > provided the script. We all can provide the data. > > There are other things to do, not necessary but nice to > have: > > - Fill in the missing original download sites. > > - Solve the issues with mismatching MD5 sums. > > - (mentioned above) Guard more libraries with the same flags > that control in their makefiles whether they are build. > Oh, BTW, I didn't carry the checksummed license texts in ooo-extras: they are simply useless for building. I moved the relevant parts of the texts to the download descriptions, it seemed more reasonable to have there. I am thinking of adding support for binary blobs in both rhino and saxon as the Apache policy is OK about carrying Java binaries. Pedro. > > > > BTW, should I also upload the Category A tarballs to > > ooo-extras? > > For me that is a question of convenience. Moving them > (not just copying them) to another site would mean that a > simple SVN checkout would not put these tarballs on your > local disk. > > Regards, > Andre > > [...] >
