On 13 Jun 2012, at 21:02, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: >>>> 2012/6/12 Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> >>>>> >>>>> II. Use Symphony as the the new base, and merge (over time) AOO (and >>>>> OOo) enhancements and bug fixes into the new trunk. This approach >>>>> quickly gives a new UI, something we could fairly call Apache >>>>> OpenOffice 4.0. >> >> Apologies if I missed this, but what version of OpenOffice.org is Symphony >> based on? Presumably we'll need to backport any features added to >> OpenOffice.org since that version if we just rebrand Symphony this way. >> > > We've been porting OOo features into Symphony on an ongoing basis for > years. So one should not think of Symphony as being derived from only > a single version of OOo. It is a mix.
OK, understood. But what was the base version of the fork you've been porting to? 3.1? Thanks, S.
