--- Ven 15/6/12, Jürgen Schmidt <[email protected]> ha scritto: ...
> > we should be careful with spreading numbers based on wild > guessing. It requires some deeper analysis. > Yes, you are right. The estimates for bringing the accessibility stuff are rather discouraging for option I though. > > Personally, I think I will work on both options > > at the same time: I do want to have an early > > Symphony BSD port. No objections if I start > > merging patches into Symphony once uploaded? :). > > you are free in the work you are doing but I think it would > be wrong. We should find an agreement on the direction we > want to move forward. Our goal is to take the best of both > and build the best free office suite ever. We shouldn't > split further resources by working on 2 code bases. > It will be the completely wrong signal. Well, I won't be doing any main development just merge some of what has already been done in AOO, mostly the BSD port. > I am of course against releasing 2 source releases based on > 2 different source trees. > There are unofficial "demo" releases of Symphony already, I am not forking, I only want to do the BSD port. > I am surprised about such an idea > Surprises can be good :). Pedro.
