On 6/22/12 1:47 PM, O.Felka wrote:
> Hello Jürgen,
> 
> Am 22.06.2012 13:03, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I analyzed and played with code signing on Windows using a self signed
>> test certificate.
>>
>> Thanks to Andre and his Perl skills I was able to fix a strange build
>> problem with a too long command line triggered from a makefile to perl.
>> Anyway this is solved now.
>>
>> I have now signed a full install set and would like to ask if somebody
>> is interested to test it and give me feedback.
> 
> I've made some quick tests under XP and Win7.
> Starting the zipped file for unpacking gives a an unknown distributor in
> the UAC dialog.

I assume that is normal because the self signed certificate can't be
verified but I have to collect more info ...

 The same when I start the the setup.exe.
> The properties of the zipped download file, the msi file and the
> setup.exe shoa "Apache OpenOffice (DevBuild)" as
> 'Signaturgeberinformation'.

that is expected

> 
> Installing the Office and looking at the 'control panel -> Add remove
> and software' shows "OpenOffice.org" as distributor.

mmh, I am not sure where this information comes from. Again I have
collect more info...

But thanks for the feedback

Juergen

> 
> I fear that this is not what you've wanted.
> 
> Groetjes,
> Olaf
> 
>>
>> You can find a signed download file under
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/signing_test/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>
>>
>> NOICE: this is a build based on AOO34 branch without the updated version
>> numbers. It's no dev build, please be careful if you test it.
>>
>> I have to check the whole process and probably have to improve some
>> things to make it final. The last important step is triggered manual by
>> now.
>>
>> I use a Personal Information Exchange file (*.pfx) of my self signed
>> certificate with a passcode that is specified during the build process.
>>
>> This seems to be a good approach to handle a certificate in this
>> scenario and during our build process.
>>
>> I will keep you informed...
>>
>> Juergen
>>
> 
> 


Reply via email to