On 13.07.2012 04:41, Shan Zhu wrote:
Perhaps, we can tag the interoperability issue about MSoffice2007 and
MSoffice2010 together using tag "interop_OOXML".
2 reasons:
1. This type of issues ususally exist with files created in both of the two
versions.
2. For many sample files, especially files from the users or download from
website, we can not know exactly that which version of Office had been used
to created/modified them.
These are good reasons and there was no opposing argument, so I assume
that "lazy consensus" applies here: The new keyword was added.
PS: Another question is which tag we should used to mark the issue found in
.xls that created by MSoffice2007/2010, even the eariler Office versions.
"interop_ms2003" can not cover the issue in such a scenario. Using
"interop_MSbinary" instead ?
There is a keyword named "ms_interoperability" and 758 issues are
already flagged with it:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?keywords=ms_interoperability
To make it and the new interop_OOXML symmetric and orthogonal again it
should IMHO be renamed e.g. to interop_MSbinary. Is that what was meant?
Herbert
