On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Kay Schenk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Dave Brondsema <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Kay Schenk <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Kay Schenk <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:43 AM, drew jensen >> > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 10:35 -0400, drew wrote: >> > >> >> >> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 16:15 +0200, Joost Andrae wrote: >> > >> >> >> > Hi Rob, >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > it seems so...but Peter's own MirrorBrain OOo MirrorBrain page >> > is >> > >> >> still >> > >> >> >> > working. In the past we asked Peter sometimes to use it as a >> > >> fail-over >> > >> >> >> > system and it worked properly. >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > http://ooo.mirrorbrain.org >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> hmmm - well I can get it to work sometimes, but other times >> fails >> > >> and it >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > just to clarify - I don't mean that the link above works >> sometimes >> > - I >> > >> >> > mean that the download triggered from the OO.o site works for me >> > other >> > >> >> > then when tds.net is the actual server. >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Scanning over the website I see two kinds of mirror brain links. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> One kind points to openoffice.mirrorbrain.org. That is what we >> use >> > on >> > >> >> the legacy download page and some of the NL pages, e.g., >> > >> >> da.openoffice.org >> > >> >> >> > >> >> The other kind links to download.services.openoffice.org. That is >> > >> >> what the Finnish NL page uses. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> From what I can tell the openoffice.mirrorbrain.org ones are >> working >> > >> >> fine. it is the download.services.openoffice.org ones that are >> > >> >> failing. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> -Rob >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > We seem to have MANY references to >> download.services.openoffice.org >> > >> > in the web pages. Maybe INFRA could do a DNS redirect for us from >> > >> > download.services.openoffice.org -> openoffice.mirrorbrain.org? >> > >> > >> > >> > Should we request this? >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> If it is all in HTML pages that we control, it would be better to >> > >> update the HTML. >> > >> >> > >> But I wonder whether we should just point them all to SourceForge? >> > >> So far no one has taken the lead on figuring out what we need to do to >> > >> maintain MirrorBrain. So we're constantly one hiccup away for that >> > >> service failing entirely. If the directory structure is the same >> > >> this could be an easy search and replace operation (or a small set of >> > >> them) on ooo-site. >> > >> >> > >> -Rob >> > >> >> > > >> > > Before I stopped my search of the website content ("grep"), I had 3133 >> > > occurrences. Maybe 75% of the way done I think. So, a lot...so far, a >> > mix >> > > of 3.3 downloads (at SourceForge), and 3.2 (not at SourceForge). So, we >> > > could definitely change the 3.3 references to SourceForge, but what >> about >> > > the 3.2 references? >> > > >> > >> > I do have some stats on MirrorBrain downloads of OOo. So in the most >> > recent full month (June) the download counts were: >> > >> > OOo 3.3.0: 586,785 >> > OOo 3.2.1: 1,365 >> > OOo 3.2.0: 166 >> > OOo 3.1.0: 23 >> > OOo 3.0.1: 24 >> > OOo 3.0.0: 60 >> > >> > (In that same time period AOO 3.4.0 had 4M downloads) >> > >> > So I think we should focus on the OOo 3.3.0 links. They are being >> > used over 400x more often then the 3.2.1 links. >> > >> > Do we know whether SF has a complete copy of the OOo 3.3.0 files, with >> > all languages/platforms? >> > >> > >> Yes, I believe SF should have all the 3.3.0 files. They should align with >> existing directory structure too. A few examples: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.3.0/ >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/hu/3.3.0/ >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/packages/7/ >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/extended/iso/en/ >> >> >> -- >> Dave Brondsema >> Principal Software Engineer - sf.net >> Geeknet >> >> -- >> ==== >> This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It >> may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the >> intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, >> distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly >> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately >> notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any >> attachment(s) from your system. Thank you. >> >> > We could certainly change all the 3.2 references to 3.3 (at SourceForge) if > that's your thinking. I'd need to check on the naming for 3.3 vs 3.2. It's > doable...it would probably be better to do areas at a time rather than all > at once. >
I was thinking of something simpler: 1) fix the 3.3 links to point to SourceForge. 2) ignore the 3.2 links for now. We can deal with them, if needed, later. But not as urgent -Rob -Rob > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "I'm just a normal jerk who happens to make music. > As long as my brain and fingers work, I'm cool." > -- Eddie Van Halen
