On 30 July 2012 15:14, Raphael Bircher <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 30.07.12 16:00, schrieb Rob Weir: >> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Raphael Bircher wrote: >>>> I working at the moment on the Archive for the AOO 3.4.0. The big >>>> question is: Is it enough to archive only the langpacks and a en-US >>>> Version? Same Question also for older Versions. We would save a load of >>>> disk space at Apache. >>> >>> It would be better to archive everything we distributed officially. I know >>> there is a lot of redundancy, but this is due to the fact that we are >>> redundant also in our official distribution. >>> >> +1. Archive whatever we release. If we want to solve the size issue >> then we need to change how we package OpenOffice releases. That will >> require some engineering work. If it was easy then someone would have >> already done it. > But also the old archive is not compleete.
If you are referring to versions created before OO joined the ASF, I don't think we need to archive those. > We archive the full version > for a while, and then we reduce it to the english version only AFAIK, we never delete archive files. > This time it's "only" about 16 GB. but I'm not happy with the solution. > > > Greetings Raphael > > -- > My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
