On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Andre Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > > On 30.07.2012 19:19, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >> Please be sure to decouple the source builds >> from downloading artifacts directly from svn.apache.org. >> I trust that has been done by now as what 3.4.0 >> did constitutes an infra policy violation, besides >> complicating eventual graduation moves of your svn tree. > > > Good point. Thanks for reminding me. I have created bug 120425 [1] for > copying the category-A tarballs to an external server, apache-extras. I am > doing this on trunk because, as I hope you will agree, a micro release is > not the right place for such a change. >
The issue is our svn tree will move after graduation, but there is no redirection like there is with the website. So instead of being in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ we will be in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice or something like that. So those who have downloaded the AOO 3.4.1. source tarball will find that their script breaks. -Rob > Andre > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120425 > > >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Rob Weir <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:17 PM >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 >>> (incubating) >>> >>> I plan on testing the Release Candidate 3.4.1 on WinXP/SP3, and >>> verifying installing over OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0 and LO 3.5.5. >>> >>> It would be good if others could mention what they intend to look at, >>> so we can avoid unnecessary duplication of effort. >>> >>> Also, is the RAT scan results online anywhere? It would be good to >>> review that. >>> >>> Also, if anyone has handy a diff of the NOTICE and LICENSE files from >>> 3.4.0 to 3.4.1, that would be good to review as well. >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>> >>> >
