On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 13:11:43 -0400: >>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21 +0200: >>>>> Is it possible that somebody from the Apache Infrastructure can >>>>> provide a view on which URL the traffic load was soo high that the >>>>> servers got in trouble? >>>>> >>>> >>>> POST requests to /ProductUpdateService/check.Update file >>>> >>> >>> For which subdomain, which UpdateXX.openoffice.org ? >> >> The access log doesn't say, and the error log has >> >> % fgrep /ProductUpdateService/check.Update error_log | sed -e >> 's#^.*/content/projects/##' | cut -d/ -f1 | sort | uniq -c >> >> EU: >> 232046 update30 >> 35548 update34 >> 76543 update35 >> >> >> US: >> 198996 update30 >> 33450 update34 >> 71117 update35 >> 0 update36 > > We don't see update32 because those do not get redirected in the same way > because there is no ooo-site/trunk/content/projects/update32 > > ./update/aoo341/check.Update > ./update/ProductUpdateService/check.Update > ./update30/ProductUpdateService/check.Update > ./update34/ProductUpdateService/check.Update > ./update34/ProductUpdateService/test.Update > ./update35/ProductUpdateService/check.Update > ./update35/ProductUpdateService/test.Update > ./update36/ProductUpdateService/check.Update > ./update38/ProductUpdateService/check.Update > > It looks like 34 and 35 have been trouble, but not as bad as 30. >
But haven't 34 and 35 been in production since early July? We've certainly seen plenty of downloads triggered by them. They should not be giving any errors, since the requests resolve to files on our site. I wonder, could the errors in those be caused by the outage caused by the errors in update30? -Rob > Regards, > Dave
