+1. On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Which better agrees with written policy anyway- the sigs > are part of the release package to be voted on and voted on > by the PMC, so even tho it constitutes individual sigs > those sigs (well at least the RM's sig) are PMC-approved. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> >> To: gene...@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> >> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 1:03 PM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote >> >> On Aug 27, 2012 9:57 AM, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> >> wrote: >>> ... >>> But recall in all this that even when the PMC releases code, it is >>> signed by the individual RM, and not by the PMC itself. >> >> Apache Subversion releases tend to have a half-dozen signatures. Thus, I'd >> say they are signed by the PMC. For example: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/subversion-1.7.6.tar.bz2.asc >> >> Cheers, >> -g >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
