On 9/17/12, Andrew Rist <[email protected]> wrote: > One thing I think it is important to point out is that this is not a > proposal for the 'Final PMC' as in the ONLY ten I think belong on the PMC. > This approach is to have everyone give up their nomination list 10 > worthy community members. Assuming all the lists are not identical - > the final list should be a more full representation of the project.
I understand the point of having a pool of 10 members and decide from it, however is the discussion of seats a requirement for the graduation, and if such, will there be taken from the amount of mentions? Since the graduation is projected for ApacheCon these points become also relevant to address. > > Someone had to go first - I offered my neck... > > A. > > On 9/17/2012 11:19 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> Being a committer on the project means you >> have the right to do work on it, whereas being >> a PMC member means you have the right to control >> its direction. Some people like to say committers >> not on the PMC are working on someone else's project, >> but I wouldn't go that far. >> >> >> Anyway I only mention this because your proposal looks >> a little on the short side, which could cause problems >> if you care about ensuring project governance is >> representative ofall the people who are dedicated and >> willing to workon it. Hell you didn't even include >> yourself in the list ;-). >> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Andrew Rist <[email protected]> >>> To: ooo-dev <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 2:13 PM >>> Subject: [PMC] Proposed PMC List >>> >>> >>> Andre Fischer (af) >>> Andrea Pescetti (pescetti) >>> Drew Jensen (atjensen) >>> Jürgen Schmidt (jsc) >>> Kay Schenk (kschenk) >>> Raphael Bircher (rbircher) >>> Pedro Giffuni (pfg) >>> Yang Shih-Ching (imacat) >>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann (orw) >>> RGB.ES (rgb-es) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > -- Alexandro Colorado PPMC Apache OpenOffice http://es.openoffice.org
