--- Ven 28/9/12, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <orwittm...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
> Da: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann . > >> > > > > Actually, the key definition is here: > > > > http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/Current%20(trunk)/solenv/inc/settings.mk#894 > > > > We already ignore USE_STLP_DEBUG for OS2. Should we add > Windows to the list? > > > > Not having CDEFS+=-D_STLP_DEBUG means that we will have no > additional checking stuff in a DEBUG=yes build. Right? > It means we lose the STLport specific debugging. We will lose it anyway when we drop STLport. > > My current impression is the following: > - the new boost version makes more or different use of stl Newer boost appears to have its own debugging support, but I havent looked into it. > - we are not building with the "right" compiler and link > switches in DEBUG=yes builds. Yes, this is something important to review. We could be getting better information for MSVC. > - the three needed adjustments to module setup_native, > svtools and sw avoid the > build breakers. I am not sure, if they are only workaround > I tend to agree here too. Pedro.
