Am 10/08/2012 11:05 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 10/5/12 9:23 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 10/05/2012 09:57 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 10/4/12 10:33 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Hi Mac fans,

as I've no Mac at hand please can someone help me with verifing and
fixing the checksum instructions:

http://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums/3.4.1_checksums.html#howto

"This is how you verify with ASC and KEYS hashes on Mac OS"

A user has reported a problem with the following line:

KEYID="0x`...

(see IZ 121159 for reference)

Thanks in advance

why so complicate? I am no gpg guru but I thought it should be enough to

I simply collected what I've found in the Internet.

1. import the official KEYS as you have described
2. gpg --verify
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_MacOS_x86_install_en-GB.dmg.asc
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_MacOS_x86_install_en-GB.dmg

Result if it's ok:

gpg: Signature made Mon Aug 13 15:47:11 2012 CEST using RSA key ID
ABABABAB
gpg: Good signature from "Juergen Schmidt<x...@xxx.com>"
gpg:                 aka "Juergen Schmidt<y...@yyy.com>"
gpg:                 aka "Juergen Schmidt<v...@vvv.org>"

Result if it's a bad signature:

gpg: Signature made Mon Aug 13 15:47:11 2012 CEST using RSA key ID
ABABABAB
gpg: BAD signature from "Juergen Schmidt<x...@xxx.com>"

Interesting, at least on Linux I've to do all the steps listed in the
Linux section. So, you don't have to do this on Mac OS? A simple "gpg
--verify KEYS" is enough to get a "Good ..." or "Bad ..." result?

I am not sure if I understand you here, I verified the *.asc file with
> the original file.

So, the question is, how? Please be as detailed possible, I've no chance to reproduce. ;-)

I would expect that this works on all platforms more
or less in the same way.

OK, to make it simple. The following commands do not work on Linux:

$ wget http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/KEYS
$ gpg --import KEYS
$ gpg --verify install_binary.tar.gz.asc install_binary.tar.gz

Does this work on MacOS X? If not please help me to get it working.

Thanks

Marcus

Reply via email to