Ariel,
  Thanks very much for your information!
  The reason I cleaned the Target Milestone field was that for those
issues, the value of "AOO 3.5.0" was inherited from original OOo system,
but not being set newly. So I treated them as invalid value. But if they
are really new features in our code, let's update the BZ records and add
the Target Milestone field back.

- Simon


2012/10/11 Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org>

> Hi Shenfeng Liu,
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:41:49PM +0800, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> > Ariel,
> >   I'm cleaning up the Target Milestone field for our 3.5 milestone build.
> >   Below case is the situation that from the defect history it looks like
> a
> > very old defect, but in fact it was not committed until recently.
> >   I also has several similar defects below. I wonder if you can tell me
> > whether they are the same situation?
>
> I don't know much about spreadsheet code, but there are some threads
> explaining these new functions' situation:
>
> http://markmail.org/thread/e5j5e7lp35eajfod
> http://markmail.org/thread/6jnh2cxjkrzv7pwe from this I took the
> information
>
> > 114428    VERIFIED    FIXED    ODFF: implement XOR spreadsheet function
> > 4/28/2011 17:05    AOO 3.5.0
> > 20878    RESOLVED    FIXED    Q-PCD Show spaces at end of a wrapped line
> in
> > Writer    2/15/2012 11:13    AOO 3.5.0
> > 90269    VERIFIED    FIXED    ODFF: implement COUNTIFS function
> > 5/11/2012 15:36    AOO 3.5.0
> > 95144    VERIFIED    FIXED    ODFF: implement SUMIFS()    5/11/2012
> > 15:36    AOO 3.5.0
> > 101466    VERIFIED    FIXED    ODFF: implement AVERAGEIF and AVERAGEIFS
> > 5/11/2012 15:36    AOO 3.5.0
>
> As Regina tells, code was committed on 5.Sept.2012, so target should be
> AOO 3.5.0. I don't know the status, sure Regina can enlighten us; it
> seems documentation on the Online Help is missing, besides translation
> (I guess these new functions will be localized too, but the Pootle
> server is in AOO34 branch).
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> La Plata, Argentina
>

Reply via email to