As far as I can see on the usage are your assumption correct, and there must be other ways to make different readme text platform dependent.
Would it not be ok, to have one readme for all platforms, and in the text mention the specics ? janI On 22 October 2012 13:34, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/21/12 2:16 PM, jan iversen wrote: > > There is exactly one file with extension .xrm > > > > main/read_license_oo/docs/readme/readme.xrm > > > > is there a reason (apart from history) for it being in .xrm or could it > be > > converted to e.g. .xhp ? > > > > If so we could get rid of one more conversion tool (read: does not need > to > > be converted to new code). > > > > I am not sure if xhp would be a good option here. But we can probably > switch to something else. Maybe a common readme file that gets extended > with platform specific portions from other files. When I remember it > correctly the xrm files contains the content for the readme file and > depending on the platform different content is extracted from this file. > > Juergen > >
