So it is "just" a matter of having a checkbox next to the the search (upper corner) ?
but I assume the setup of wiki is INFRA and not something we control locally, so a change is not very easy (or how to request such a change) ? jan. On 26 October 2012 21:36, RGB ES <rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/10/26 jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> > > > Thanks for clearing that up. I have just been searching for build > > instructions (again), and in the search response I cannot see if an > article > > is outdated, so I had to open some before I got the correct one. > > > > Would it be an idea (if possible) to have "outdated" as a category, and > > extend the search to say with/without outdated, if possible that would > work > > fine for me since I would hit the recent one when searching. > > > > AFAIK, the "outdated" template also apply the outdated category: > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Category:Outdated > > Regard > Ricardo > > > > > > > regards > > Jan. > > > > On 26 October 2012 21:16, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net > > >wrote: > > > > > Jan; > > > {{Documentation/Outdated}} and {{delete}} are two seperate entities. > > > Outdated merely says that some inormation is outdated and should be > > > revised. {{delete}} is a special case that marks a file for speedy > > deletion > > > by an wiki administrator. > > > > > > At least with the user documentation we tend to add to the document for > > > newer versions of the software rather than get rid of it as there are > > still > > > people using older versions. This can however get carried to extremes. > My > > > personal opinion is that it is probably time to start seriously > > > considering purging version 2.x stuff, but that is a discussion for > > another > > > thread. > > > > > > Regards > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > > > > jan iversen wrote: > > > > > >> So if an article is outdated, then it is ready for deletion....or ??? > > >> > > >> Is it wise to have outdated articles alongside the correct/newer ones, > > >> thinking of e.g. building instructions it would at least confuse me. > > >> > > >> but I have no problem using {{Delete}} thanks for advicing me. > > >> > > >> jan. > > >> > > >> On 26 October 2012 19:03, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net > > >** > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> Jan; > > >>> > > >>> No the outdated symbol is different. {{Delete}} Is a template that > puts > > >>> the article in a special category to be deleted by an admin or by a > > bot. > > >>> > > >>> Keith > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> jan iversen wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Do you mean the "outdated" symbol, which should do just fine ?? > > >>>> > > >>>> Jan. > > >>>> > > >>>> On 26 October 2012 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> On 10/25/12 9:19 PM, jan iversen wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Maybe we could move them to an archive.... ?? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> I think we can find probably common consensus that we want to > delete > > >>>>> pages to clean up this old stuff. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> For example nobody needs today the old building guides. Let us > focus > > on > > >>>>> the future and here I think less but correct and up-to-date > > information > > >>>>> is more. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> When I remember correct there exist a template that could be used > to > > >>>>> mark a page for deletion. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Simply put {{Delete}} on top of the page > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Or we can create our own delete template with further instructions > > how > > >>>>> to proceed. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Administrator can for this from time to time and can delete stuff. > Or > > >>>>> we > > >>>>> can try to cleanup such pages via a wiki bot. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Juergen > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> jan > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 25 October 2012 21:12, Alexandro Colorado <j...@oooes.org> > wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Nobody want to delete information and wiki pages only admin can > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> actually delete pages. Even then there might be some rights about > > >>>>>>> ownership. Is like sourceforge dont delete inactive projects. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Still good conversation to debate. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 10/25/12, jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> To my knowledge, articles that are marked outdated with a > > reference > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> newer article stays in Wiki. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Would it not be a good idea to remove such pages, in order not > to > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> confuse > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> users ?? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> There are however no means, which I can find, to do that ? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Reason for my idea/question is that I am looking at localization > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> (l10n), > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> and there are a bit of old information. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Jan. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Alexandro Colorado > > >>>>>>> PPMC Apache OpenOffice > > >>>>>>> http://es.openoffice.org > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
