On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Roberto,
>
> On 12-10-31, at 15:14 , Roberto Galoppini <rgalopp...@geek.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> On 29/10/2012 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A more diverse and sustainable project. For example, until few years
> >>> ago having OOo integrated or at least able to interoperate with SAP
> >>> was a distinct dream, is there any chance we can have the right SAP
> >>> people to attend the AOO BoF, and discuss about this?
> >>
> >>
> >> This would be quite interesting too. I don't have any contacts, but it
> would
> >> be good to have SAP people there and, in general, devote a part of the
> >> session to exploring how OpenOffice can interoperate with other
> solutions
> >> (or what the OpenOffice community can do to allow others to be able to
> >> integrate with OpenOffice more easily), so not only the community in a
> >> strict sense but the ecosystem around it too.
> >
> > I have sent an email to my open source contacts at SAP, maybe other
> > Apache members might have contacts too.
> >
>
> I have my old friend from Sun, Erwin T., as well as others through him,
> and then some outside of open source. We've had discussions with SAP
> before—but that was prior-moulting, when we were still Oracles.
>


I've dropped a couple of emails, but it's All Saints in Germany and it
would be unlikely to hear back before Monday.

> Having been in the OOo migrations' business for some years, I firmly
> > believe we should try hard to reduce the SI integration gap.
>
> Absolutely. Totally agree. Huzza. So let's. Can we perhaps formalize this
> in a wiki of Things That Are Important or At Least Worth It?
>

We might do that, but a survey could probably do a better job in this
respect, though. While actually for things like SAP we've heard that so
many times from medium-large companies that likely we do not need to ask.

Roberto


>
> Louis
> >
> > Roberto
> >
> >> Regards,
> >>  Andrea.
>

-- 
====
This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It 
may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately 
notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.

Reply via email to