https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118997
--- Comment #7 from Uwe Fischer <[email protected]> 2012-03-02 08:24:20 UTC --- Regina, thank you for your comments. These two patches and the one in 118979 were my first attempts in creating patches. Instead of the following two header lines: --- 01010500.xhp Mon Feb 27 11:50:42 2012 +++ new01010500.xhp Thu Mar 01 19:13:30 2012 there should be instead these two lines to get the file names right: --- old01010500.xhp Mon Feb 27 11:50:42 2012 +++ 01010500.xhp Thu Mar 01 19:13:30 2012 The patch view of Bugzilla only shows the correct file name on top, then the old file contents at the left and the new contents at the right. So I suppose Bugzilla gets it right, the patch will change the existing file and not create a new one. I cannot open the second patch attachment for viewing now. Don't know why. Would it be better to have both file patches in one patch file? But then I would have to find out how to include the complete path of the files (starting from where?) I inserted the comment because I'm not sure about the CMYK and RGB handling. The line above the comment says this: "%PRODUCTNAME uses only the RGB color model for printing in color. The CMYK controls are provided only to ease the input of color values using CMYK notation." This is about printing, not storing, of color values. It would be fine to write a guide or tutorial describing the new Color Picker and the handling of colors. However, I don't know too much about this at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
