https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119692
Armin Le Grand <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Armin Le Grand <[email protected]> --- ALG: The difference is that the filling looks different. - in MS, all character-polyPolygons are put into a single PolyPolygon, thus e.g. the 'o' and 'u' overlapping is transparent (see better when copying object to PPT and choosing a fill style). - In AOO, each single charater is a filled PolyPolygon, so the overlappings depend on the order in which these are painted. In principle I would guess that's it an error in MS that a single PolyPolygon is used (and not a group of one PolyPolygon per character). Thus it is questionable to call this the 'correct' viszualisation. On the other hand it is an error on our side that the ordering of the shapes makes it look wrong, e.g. the 'u' should be painted first so that the 'o' overlaps it. The order of painting seems to rely simply on character order. This could evtl. be fixed by sorting 'mirrored' characters to the back. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
