Op 11-7-2012 16:31, [email protected] schreef:
Hello!
I just subscribe this list.
I made a proposal to Duch SCSTR_FIELDSEP text in Pootle. I reality
there is two proposals, firs was not so good.
I suppose there are some dead line for this change to have it in next
version?
Regards
Risto
Below is copy of original post:
Hi,
I have confirmed issue
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120216. The problem is,
that the export from Calc to csv does not work.
I guess, that there is something wrong in the translation, therefore I
write to [email protected].
It is the string SCSTR_FIELDSEP.
In nl I see
,\t\t44\t\t;\t\t59\t\t:\t\t58\t\t{Tab}\t\t9\t\t{spatie}\t\t32
In de I see
,\t44\t;\t59\t:\t58\t{Tab}\t9\t{Leer}\t32
There seems to be some additional \t in nl which should not be there.
I'm not familiar with Pootle, but hope that you can find it with this
information.
Kind regards
Regina
Regina / Ristoi,
thanks for stepping in.
I've fiound the conflicting string.
It is due to some superfluous tabs that got into the Dutch trabslation.
(As Regina saw correctly)
I noticed that tose appear when you copy the original English string to
the field for editing
I removed the superfluous tabs and adjusted the Dutch translation. I
can't check if the correction
stnds if the suggestion will be accepted, since I have no acces to Pootle.
As Ristoi did I entered a suggestion 2 (nobody)
In Ristoii's suggestions I see the removed tabs as strikethrough, which
is probably not the solution
@Juergen: please accept suggestiion #2 in segment 2609
(scstring.src#SCSTR_FIELDSEP.string.text)
to see if the suggestion stands. If not I will type
the text in the field for editing instead of copying it
from the original text
--
DiGro
Windows 7 and OpenOffice.org 3.3
Scanned with Ziggo uitgebreide Internetbeveiliging (F-Secure)
