Hi 2012/4/3 richard clary <[email protected]>: > I also left the conference call with a positive feeling. A bi-weekly call > could be beneficial as to sharing the status of an individual’s > initiative/project. The group’s collective feedback on a real-time basis > could add momentum to or redirect individual objectives. A scribe, > committee chair, vision/mission statement, a shared progress chart talked > to by task owners are necessities in my opinion.
Humm... A vision from a non-english speaker: by years, i did a work completly out of mkting project, and arrived to 10M of desktops running OOo/Broo in Brazil. When i tried stay more close of Florian and Peter, was very dificult for me (in function of my bad english) to interact better with them. What i saw as a good practice was to share this things inside the list and wiki, what *for me* was improved many more inside of TDF. I see that we need rescue the wiki, give a good priority in organize it as a multilingual wiki and align the actions. Sure, i agree that when we have this parts working fine, the "voices part" is fun and can append many more for our process. My two cents. Best, Claudio
