On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Petr Cech wrote:


thank you! Does it mean that I have check libdb2 first?
Tamas, is it correct?

> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 01:05:33AM +0200 , Grin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 01:56:10AM +0300, Igor Khasilev wrote:
> > 
> > > ./configure --sbindir=/usr/local/sbin --sysconfdir=/usr/local/etc/oops 
> > >             --localstatedir=/var/run --libdir=/usr/local/libexec/oops
> > > 
> > > executables oops and oopsctl will be in /usr/local/sbin,
> > > oops.cfg, tables, templates, rules will be in /usr/local/etc/oops,
> > > oops.pid in /var/run,
> > > modules in /usr/local/etc/oops,
> > > in /usr/local/oops you will have directories logs/, storages/, DB/
> > 
> > What about oopsctl pipe?
> > 
> > > Also can you help with one problem? This is how some users describe it. For
> > > some reason Debian have old BerkeleyDB (ver 2.4.14) and newer version
> > > (2.7.7) in distribution.
> > 
> > The reason is the plenty of programs failing to work with 2.7.7, or at
> > least compiled against the old version.
> 
> I think the problem is, that the old one is in glibc-2.1 and is linked with
> -ldb with the header in <db.h> and the new one (but still a bit dated as 3.0
> is out) is linked with -ldb2 IIRC with the header in <db2.h> or <db2/db.h>
> 
> > 
> > > During ./configure procedure OLD vesion instead of
> > > NEW version selected for some unknown reason. I have no Debian system to
> > > test what happens. Can you send me paths to these libraries, so I can change
> > > configure.in to solve this problem?
> > 
> > He should remove old libdbXXX-dev and install new libdbXXX-dev package I think.
> > Development files are always separated to -dev packages, and they can be
> > installed independent of the shared library package's version.
> 
> for the libdb2 mess it unfortunatelly is not so, but it should be fixed when
> 2.1.93 (glibc) will appear.
>                               Petr Cech
> -- 
> Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
>            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> * Joy notes some people think "Unix" is a misspelling of "Unics" which is a 
>misspelling of "Emacs" :)
> =====================================================================
> If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body.
> Archive is accessible on http://www.paco.net/oops/
> 

Igor Khasilev                |
PACO Links, [EMAIL PROTECTED]    |


=====================================================================
If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body.
Archive is accessible on http://www.paco.net/oops/

Дати відповідь електронним листом