On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Andy Igoshin wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Andy Igoshin wrote:
> >
> > g++ -c -g -O2 -pthread
> > -DPACKAGE=\"gigabase\" -DVERSION=\"2.32\" -D_REENTRANT=1
> >
> > uhm, if it is gigabase-2.37.tar.gz why do we need that kind of
> > -DVERSION? :)
>
> Oh, no. :)
>
> configure this distribution kit it is not perfect.
okok, i use the linux version, but seems ugly still. :))
> > btw, sometimes this package seems so old. do you maintain it?
> Yes, I mantainer of this (AIX) package.
>
> After version 2.32 there were cosmetic changes and I did not make the
> package.
> Serious changes were at 2.35 and further, but 2.35-2.37 quitted very
> fast.
and is the linux version affected by these changes too? i'm asking because
some ppl mentioned that the oops is redically faster with gigabase than
with the db2/3, and i'm thinking about to try with that, but the previous
versions of the gigabase was uncompilable on linux. i don't remember these
problems, but i delayed the problem. :/
so, any experiences between oops/db and oops/gigabase?
> Author's homepage is http://www.ispras.ru/~knizhnik/gigabase.html
yep i know, and the subsql seems interesting. maybe helps in the hacking
of databases that is necessary on some cases with oops/db :(
--
VWOL
Tamas SZERB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG public key: http://alabama.rulez.org/~toma/gpgkey-toma.asc
=====================================================================
If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body.
Archive is accessible on http://www.paco.net/oops/
