Hallo,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 05:33:18PM +0300, Igor Khasilev wrote:
> > I've got a small network of windows boxes, for which my FreeBSD box
> > acts as a server with oops being run as a proxy server.
> >
> > Further, there are two more proxy servers (another oops & squid),
> > which can (and must) be used as parent proxies, since direct internet
> > connection is very slow. The first one is preferable but it goes down
>
> This should not nappen (if you mean oops under first).
Well, apparently it's not oops that goes down but network connection.
:-) One time oops has also silently died though.
> > Well, I could roll out a script that would check network connections,
> > `sed` the config file and `kill -1` oops, but is there any better
> > decision? Could this be achieved with cache peering or whatever?
>
> The solution is: describe both parents as icp parents, using
>
> peer ... {
> ...
> parent ;
> ...
> }
>
> List more preferable parent first. Then any requests will go through
> first answered peer. If any peer will not answer then request will go via
> another peer.
Big thanks. I wonder, where I can find any info regarding icp
protocol. I thought icp peers would only check the request against
their own caches and wouldn't make any further requests on behalf of
themselves... It's not true, I guess?
oleg
=====================================================================
If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body.
Archive is accessible on http://lists.paco.net/oops-eng/
